Comments on Editorial Backup

Comment by FireDragon

Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:55:52

I confirm that neither WF version is working on my iPad Pro 9.7 either.

Comment by Rol

Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:13:56

Neither WF version is working on my iPad Pro 9.7.

Comment by MyGeekDaddy

Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:26:52

There is another 'Editorial Backup' WF that appears to be identical to this one, however the other WF works for me. http://www.editorial-workflows.com/workflow/5875078046679040/48wEzZVrovc

Comment by MyGeekDaddy

Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:14:14

Yep. Getting the same error on iPad Pro and iPhone 6s. Backups give me the zip error before 1980 and restore does not find any of my backups.

Comment by anonymous

Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:03:54

I'm not sure if this is the same version of the workflow, but I installed my workflow by tapping the wrench button/More Workflows/Editorial Backup from Editorial 1.3.

I then get the following error message in the console when trying to backup for the first time: " ZIP does not support timestamps before 1980"

Any ideas?

Comment by @dahanbn

Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:42:51

Sorry, the missing template backup belongs to that workflow.

As it seems it doesn't back up the templates as well? Could it be possible that templates also will be backed up and can be restored in a future version?

Comment by @olemoritz

Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:48:02

Right, thanks. Not sure why I edited a different version.

Comment by @ClareMacraeUK

Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:24:27

Thanks for providing the fixed prompt in http://www.editorial-workflows.com/workflow/5895111988740096/0J91ZjD5JJQ.

Even more minor point: it might be worth making that the one that is linked to from the workflows home page.

Comment by @olemoritz

Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:50:11

Thanks, that was from an old version of the workflow that only backed up workflows. I've changed the message accordingly now.

Comment by @ClareMacraeUK

Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:36:37

The prompt "This will replace all your workflows with the ones that are stored in the selected backup" is a bit misleading, as it replaces a bunch of other stuff as well, AFAICT.