<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on Bookmarks Folder</title>
    <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5250502627426304/JCmwgKElKG8</link>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Comment by @olemoritz</title>
      <description>@the_buch It&#39;s mostly easier to set up, since you can&#39;t run a sub-workflow by name using a variable.</description>
      <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5250502627426304/JCmwgKElKG8</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5324446529224704</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 23:20:40 </pubDate>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Comment by The_buch</title>
      <description>This looks cleaner in the workflow editor, certainly, but would you say/think this is more effective versus using sub workflows (regardless of ease of setup)? I&#39;m just curious. And I hadn&#39;t thought of this, thanks Ole!</description>
      <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5250502627426304/JCmwgKElKG8</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5292172131696640</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:07:45 </pubDate>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Tutorial Doctor</title>
      <description>Haha I just made two workflows that do the same thing. One for text editing, and another for file handling. </description>
      <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5250502627426304/JCmwgKElKG8</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5325314649489408</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:05:49 </pubDate>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>5250502627426304/JCmwgKElKG8