<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on PDF (LaTeX)</title>
    <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5245394703351808/W5YhtQWbp0g</link>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Comment by anonymous</title>
      <description>Texpad natively supports markdown formatting on an equal footing with Latex anyway, so you don&#39;t gain much by using editorial here.</description>
      <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5245394703351808/W5YhtQWbp0g</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6437179542732800</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:40:23 </pubDate>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jeremy Kidwell</title>
      <description>I installed this workflow and gave it a spin, particularly since I like the idea of typesetting MD--&amp;gt;LaTeX--&amp;gt;PDF. There&#39;s only one limitation that I can see, and this is that there are a few features I&#39;m using from MMD, i.e. footnotes in particular (&lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/fletcher/MultiMarkdown/wiki/MultiMarkdown-Syntax-Guide#footnotes&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&gt;https://github.com/fletcher/MultiMarkdown/wiki/MultiMarkdown-Syntax-Guide#footnotes&lt;/a&gt;) and the script simply doesn&#39;t parse them. Peter, do you have an alternative arrangement for formatting footnotes in your workflow, or do they simply not come up in the kind of writing you&#39;re doing? Thanks for sharing the workflow - it would be great to enhance with some MMD features if you have any ideas in this direction, happy to help.</description>
      <link>http://editorial-app.appspot.com/workflow/5245394703351808/W5YhtQWbp0g</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5787018130882560</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:53:06 </pubDate>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>5245394703351808/W5YhtQWbp0g